🔗 Share this article

The Russian central bank has stated it is pursuing compensation valued at $230 billion from the financial institution Euroclear. This action is a direct warning from the Kremlin regarding plans to utilize frozen Russian sovereign funds to support Ukraine.

The Substantial Demand

According to accounts in Russian news outlets, the central bank initiated a claim last week for approximately 18 trillion roubles. This sum corresponds to the stated $230 billion claim.

European Union officials will determine in the coming days regarding a plan to leverage approximately €210 billion in frozen Russian state funds. The proposal involves providing Ukraine with a substantial loan to finance its defence and financial stability.

The vast majority of these assets, totaling €185 billion, are stored at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. This institution acts as the main keeper for the Kremlin's immobilised financial reserves.

Divergent Legal Views

European Union officials have maintained that their proposal is on solid legal ground. They argue rests on the principle that ownership of the state assets still belongs to Russia, even though it was frozen in European countries shortly after the full-scale military offensive of Ukraine.

The Russian government, in contrast, has labeled any use of the funds as theft. Authorities have threatened retaliatory actions, such as seizing European private investors' holdings within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, who has assumed a key position in diplomatic talks, wrote on a social media platform that Russia "will win in court" and retrieve its assets. He warned that the European Union, the common currency, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the proposal.

Wider Implications

In comments seen as an effort to create division between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev characterized the assets plan as "a vicious assault on property rights and the global financial system established by the United States."

Euroclear declined to comment on the latest legal action. The institution has in the past stated it is contending with more than 100 legal cases in Russian courts.

Legal Hurdles Ahead

Although judges in EU countries are not expected to enforce judgments from Russian tribunals, experts expect Moscow to pursue implementation in nations with closer ties to the Kremlin.

"The Bank of Russia could try to implement a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in countries such as China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic states, if such assets can be identified," stated a legal expert from an international firm.

European Safeguards

EU officials said they are developing steps to discourage other countries from assisting any Russian legal action against European entities. They are also designing safeguards to shield EU member states with investments in Russia from what they call "illegal expropriation."

How the Funding Would Work

According to the complex plan, the EU would issue an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the cash earned from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's legal claim on the underlying funds would stay untouched.

Kyiv would solely be required to return the money in the event that Russia agreed to pay reparations for the immense destruction caused during the ongoing conflict.

Other Funding Ideas

Belgium, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has asked the EU to consider an alternative approach for financing Ukraine. This involves common EU debt issuance to secure a loan, using unallocated funds within the EU budget.

This alternative move, nevertheless, demands unanimity among all 27 EU countries. Hungary's government, viewed as aligned with the Kremlin, has previously signaled its opposition.

Commenting on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, a senior official, said the proposed loan scheme as "the strongest option" for supporting Ukraine. "The reparations loan is secured against the Russian frozen assets, meaning it doesn't come from our public funds, which is also important," she stated. "It also delivers a clear signal that when you do all this damage to another country, you have to pay for the rebuilding."